Coaching juco- part 2
Time to talk about junior college gymnasiums. In the midwestern and southern gyms we went to, most were great. Typically, there was a lot of buy-in by the colleges as to the purpose of athletics, and the importance of it to their communities. There was usually a tremendous amount of pride in their athletic facilities, and a real understanding of how to construct such facilities to serve the dual purpose of education provided by the institution and intercollegiate competition. Remember from an earlier blog, our first two games as coaches at Mesa Community College were played at the Cotton Fitzsimmons/Maury John arena on the campus of Moberly Area Community College in Missouri. That’s right- I said “arena”.
The large urban junior colleges are another story altogether, with the exception of Salt Lake City Community College. SLCC has several campuses around the Salt Lake area, but only one athletic program. Unlike the Maricopa system, which has several campuses in the Phoenix Metro area, each one with their own athletic program, Salt Lake can invest all of their resources for athletics in their main campus, thus their campus gymnasium is one of the best in the entire country. Much of California is like the Maricopa system, and in fact I believe the Maricopa system kind of modeled itself on California. The result is a variety of athletic facilities and an apparent lack of coaching involvement in the construction of gymnasiums. A campus gymnasium should have these minimums: regulation main court for competition and at least two regulation side courts for classes; a ticket booth outside of the main court area; a lobby with enough room to easily move crowds in and out; a concession area in the lobby with facilities for hot food; public bathrooms in the lobby that will accommodate moments such as halftime where several people may need to use them; locker rooms for men and women students who come to activity classes or fitness centers that include bathrooms and showers; locker rooms for home teams and visiting teams, with the home team room being a secure place where the team may use it for practices, off-season training, and games. The visiting team room should be built to be secured during competition, and also have showers and bathroom facilities. There should be bleachers on both sides of the main court. An auxiliary gym should be included, with the best ones being those that could have a smaller set of bleachers and be attached to the main gym building (for camps). A good auxiliary gym would have a main court and two side courts and could be used for educational purposes. Any architect should be alerted to these things and plan accordingly. The California model that Maricopa used is clearly far different.
So, let’s take a look at the Maricopa gyms. I’ll start with Scottsdale CC. They have some of the things that were mentioned as rational features. There is a fairly big lobby which includes a concession area. Their bathrooms are decent, considering the fact that the public may actually attend events in the gym. There is no ticket window, and that function is at a table once you walk into the gym- a real gaffe by the architects. I’m not sure what they had in mind for the locker room areas, either. There is no visitors locker room- they take you to a more general area of lockers adjacent to a home locker room. The problem there is there is a gap in the ceiling that allows the home team to listen to you and you can eavesdrop on the home team in the same manner. We would use the locker room to dress, but go out the back door by our bench to talk to the team. Out that door was a fitness center which was always locked, and a dance room which was sometimes unlocked. If both doors were locked, we would just be in the hallway in between the two rooms, with nowhere to sit. We used it for pregame and postgame talks, and, if the dance room was open, as a place to dress after the game. We had to bring our bags out from the locker room, as it would not be secured for the game. When you see players bring their bags out and put them behind a bench, that is a sure sign of small time thinking and/or poor gym design. Another sign is not pulling out all of your bleachers, which SCC used to, but doesn’t anymore.
Then there is Phoenix College. It has a nice sized lobby for moving people in and out, and a concession area. The bathrooms are a bit small for the size of the gym. There is no ticket window, and again only a table for ticket taking after you walk into the gym. It is a nice gym and they generally pulled most of their bleachers. There was no visitors locker room, which is amazing- only a classroom out some doors just past the home bench. No bathroom and no showers. There was a bathroom in the small foyer, but it was a women’s bathroom, so if our guys needed to use it, we had to place someone at the door to keep women out of their own bathroom. We shared that locker room with the women’s team, which is understandably not a good idea. How could the architects build such a nice facility without a visitor’s locker room? Oops.
When I first took over at MCC, Chandler-Gilbert probably had the worst junior college gym in the country. I don’t know how the coaches there could have brought a recruit in and showed them the gym, and if they did and the kid signed anyway, more power to them. The gym was at Mesa Gateway Airport and must have been an old military gym, back when that area was known as Williams Field, an Air Force base. It had only one semi-redeeming quality- a visitor’s locker room. I say semi-redeeming, because the gym was not secured and players had to bring their bags out and set them behind the bench. The bleachers were old and wooden and really shakey. One decent sized area of bleachers was broken and could not be pulled out, and there was only one side of the gym with bleachers, which restricted crowd size. That wasn’t a huge problem, however, because they never drew any crowds. There were side baskets, but one of them couldn’t be raised and hung over the main court during games. They should have made that the “bonus basket” which would give the offense at that end extra points if they made a shot there during the game. There was a tiny lobby and concession area, and that area was no good for moving any amount of people in or out. Not sure about lobby bathrooms, because all I ever wanted to do was get in, play the game, and get out. It was an embarrassment.
Chandler-Gilbert has since built a nice new gym on their main campus. It has home and visitor locker rooms that are secured for games- a huge plus. The lobby is small and there is no concession area, and curiously there is a classroom on the second floor that has a window overlooking the floor. I don’t know what the architects were thinking on that idea. It has bleachers on both sides, but they only pull one side for games. The coach told me that since he was the one who had to do the set up and take down of the gym each game, he just didn’t pull the bleachers on the side where the benches were. It seems like a lot of high schools and juco’s in Arizona do that. Another reason for many is that whoever designed the gym didn’t seem to realize that bench chairs and scorer’s tables would take up any room on the floor.
South Mountain CC passes muster on the lobby, bathrooms, and concession area. The gym always seemed a bit dimly lit, but was OK. They have bleachers on both sides and sometimes they pull them both out. I guess you know how important your game is by the number of bleachers that are pulled. For many years, we dressed in a classroom in the building, but near the end of my tenure at MCC, they created a visitor’s locker room, which was pretty nice. It was not secured during games, however, which is not classy. Nothing says small time like everybody carrying their stuff into the gym and putting them behind the bench.
And I really question the designers of the Glendale CC gym. It’s almost like a gymnasium was an afterthought after the college was designed. Like someone said “put a gym right there” and drew a rectangle on a piece of paper, because that’s pretty much what they came up with. It is a gym with no lobby, no bathrooms, no locker rooms, no concession area, and no ticket window. You literally step one foot in the gym and there is a table for entry. The person behind you will be in the doorway. There are bleachers on one side only. On the other side behind the benches, they erected a large curtain to conceal what’s behind, which is actually nothing. So, the curtain must have been an aesthetic prop, which fails miserably. At least the designers had the wherewithal to put scoreboards in the building. So where did the teams dress, you say? For many years, the visitors dressed in a general locker room in a building next door to the gym. The problem with that was that it was open to anyone at anytime who was using their other facilities. You could be talking to your team before the game or at halftime or after the game, and literally someone could walk in and start getting dressed for some other activity on the campus. Or worse, they may come in, take their clothes off and grab a shower in full view of everyone. That scenario played out many times. Eventually, they moved the visitors over to a classroom on the other side of the gym. The main problem with that was that it was a classroom and not a locker room. It had no lockers, no water fountains, and no showers, and would not be secured during the game. At least no one walked in during your pregame speech. Again, I would really like to know who designed that mess. Let’s talk. You get an F- in gym design.
Next time- coaching juco part 3 (won't forget MCC's gym)