Better, Bill? Lord knows we can't have a differing take on LSU, in spite of the FACT that most on this board have been complimentary of them. I mean, you completely ignored the FACT that I said (if GA does get in) that any of the four teams could win it. Nooooo....that wasn't good enough because you were too busy white knighting for a team that you want to be acknowledged as champ now! It's hilarious how people who think differently than you on the subject give "worthless analysis" yet you vomit "rankings" on the thread! You are obviously aware that voters can be swayed by guys like Herbstreit and Meyer for the Heisman. Do you think their opinions, and those of others, have an affect on rankings?? Yep. Has LSU played a better schedule? On paper, sure. Maybe those Top 10 teams in the SEC did so playing a shit schedule, too. Bama hasn't beaten a ranked team. Florida has beaten 1. AU is the only team on your schedule that had actual schedule strength. And, let's not forget your stupid assertion that Texas was a good team. But, they were ranked at some point! To summarize, Bill, LSU has a very good team, and they have deserved a shot at the title. They might win it, they might not. OSU has a very good team, too, Bill. On paper, they're better, but games aren't played on paper. Is my analysis worthless? To you, I'm sure it is. If it makes you feel better, your OPINIONS that you claim to be FACTS are also worthless. So, pound sand.